One refinement to your excellent post, Los Angeles already has clear regulations on the books regarding the need to secure vacant buildings, post vacate building signs and file a Trespass Arrest Authorization with the LAPD. Failure to comply is a fine of up to $1000 per day per structure, capped at $100,000 per year. It's not a question of regulation, its one of enforcement.
That’s certainly true. LA notoriously doesn’t enforce its own laws. Santa Monica, however, tends to run a much tighter ship, so I’ll be surprised if they don’t make an example of neglectful owners.
Exactly. One of the linked articles says that over 100 vacant buildings known to the County had the wrong address on file 😣 so this is a good workaround for quickly dealing with trespassers without having to first reach the owner every time it happens.
Wow, good on Santa Monica! I had no idea.
One refinement to your excellent post, Los Angeles already has clear regulations on the books regarding the need to secure vacant buildings, post vacate building signs and file a Trespass Arrest Authorization with the LAPD. Failure to comply is a fine of up to $1000 per day per structure, capped at $100,000 per year. It's not a question of regulation, its one of enforcement.
That’s certainly true. LA notoriously doesn’t enforce its own laws. Santa Monica, however, tends to run a much tighter ship, so I’ll be surprised if they don’t make an example of neglectful owners.
The problem is that too few owns too much. That's why these properties are blighted. It's an economic disparity issue.
I think it might be a greed issue, first and foremost 😞
Exactly. One of the linked articles says that over 100 vacant buildings known to the County had the wrong address on file 😣 so this is a good workaround for quickly dealing with trespassers without having to first reach the owner every time it happens.