Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Linden's avatar

THANK YOU for being a sane voice on parking. I'm all for walkable cities and public transit, but LA is nowhere near close to that and it's often our lowest-income residents who rely on vehicles to be able to work - whether it's integral to their job in construction or delivery, or they don't have the luxury of an employer who can accommodate for occasional late busses, or they need to hang on to a rent controlled unit despite their job moving 30 miles away - and all that's not even adding in kids. I feel like too many developers have been feigning alignment with the New Urbanist/Strong Towns dogma held by most city planners to win them over, but all it has done is get developers sweet deals to maximize number of units, while parking has now become underprovided essential infrastructure that falls back on residents to deal with or pay for. (Yes, I'm in Long Beach, and I can attest to the safety and quality of life issues, and how it also sours neighborly relations because we're all at each other's throats over parking; some people buy extra junk cars just to hold spots). It would be smart if, at the very least, cities collected a fee for all these new structures exempted from previous parking requirements in order to fund neighborhood parking hubs. I'm imagining things along the lines of those in Europe and Japan where they might even have rooftop public parks, food courts, or gym equipment. It would be a great way to centralize car share - possibly community-run car share services instead of the big corps - and give renters a viable option for owning electric vehicles. Thanks again for being a voice on this matter - and, yeah, those ADUs in the article look ridiculous. We're nowhere near NYC density to be expecting people to live in a cubbyhole.

Expand full comment
Mongo's avatar

..question: please explain what an ADU is? what does the acronym stand for? thank u..

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts